Scientific Poster - Scoring & Evaluation

  • Home
  • Scientific Poster
  • Scoring & Evaluation

Scientific Poster Evaluation Criteria

Grand Theme: OVERDOSE

A. Scientific Poster Assessment Rubric (70 Points Max)

No. Criteria Assessment Indicators Maximum Score
1 Relevance to Theme & Subtheme The poster aligns with the main theme, "Overdose," and the selected subtheme. The issue presented is clear, relevant, specific, and remains focused on the main topic. 10 points
2 Significance & Clarity of Problem The poster clearly explains the main issue, highlights its significance, and justifies why the topic is important for the public, healthcare professionals, or other relevant stakeholders. 10 points
3 Accuracy & Scientific Quality The information presented is accurate, evidence-based, scientifically sound, and free from misleading statements. It is consistent with the principles of pharmacy, toxicology, clinical pharmacy, patient safety, or public health. 15 points
4 Use of Data & References The poster incorporates credible, relevant, up-to-date, and verifiable data or references, such as peer-reviewed journal articles, clinical guidelines, official reports, academic textbooks, or other reliable scientific sources. 10 points
5 Depth of Analysis & Key Message The poster goes beyond presenting general information by demonstrating critical analysis, cause-and-effect relationships, scientific interpretation, educational value, or well-defined solutions related to overdose prevention and management. 10 points
6 Creativity & Innovation The poster demonstrates originality through creative ideas, approaches, visualizations, illustrations, infographics, or campaign messages that are engaging, relevant, and innovative. 5 points
7 Visual Design & Layout The poster features an attractive, well-organized, and balanced design. It is easy to read, uses appropriate color schemes, and incorporates relevant images, icons, or diagrams that effectively support the content. 5 points
8 Message Clarity & Visual Comm. The main message is clearly conveyed through a logical flow of information, concise and effective language, and visual elements that successfully communicate scientific or educational content to the intended audience. 5 points
Total Poster Score 70 points

B. Presentation Assessment Rubric (30 Points Max)

No. Criteria Assessment Indicators Maximum Score
1 Presentation Structure The presentation is delivered in a clear, logical, concise, and well-structured manner, covering background, main issue, objectives, scientific content, key message, conclusion, and recommendations. 5 points
2 Mastery of Subject Matter The participant demonstrates a thorough understanding of the presented topic by accurately explaining key concepts, theoretical background, supporting data, references, and relevance to overdose-related issues. 7 points
3 Scientific Argumentation & Accuracy The participant explains poster content logically, establishes clear connections between data or evidence and main message, and presents evidence-based conclusions and recommendations. 6 points
4 Communication Skills The participant demonstrates clear articulation, appropriate language use, accurate scientific terminology, effective intonation, confidence, and the ability to engage and maintain audience attention. 4 points
5 Use of Poster as Presentation Medium The participant effectively utilizes visual elements of the poster to support the presentation rather than simply reading text displayed on the poster. 3 points
6 Time Management The participant delivers the presentation within the time limit established by the committee (4-minute poster presentation + 3-minute Q&A). 2 points
7 Q&A Performance & Professionalism The participant responds to questions accurately, logically, scientifically, and courteously, while demonstrating professionalism and communication ethics throughout the Q&A session. 3 points
Total Presentation Score 30 points
Final Scoring Composition
  • Poster Score: 70 points
  • Poster Presentation Score: 30 points
  • Total Score: 100 points