| 1 |
Relevance to Theme & Subtheme |
The manuscript is relevant to the overarching theme of overdose and the selected subtheme. The discussion is clear, specific, and remains focused on the main issue without deviating from the topic. |
10 points |
| 2 |
Significance & Clarity of Problem |
The participant clearly explains the background, significance of the topic, key issues, objectives of the manuscript, and the direction of the discussion in a logical and systematic manner. |
10 points |
| 3 |
Literature Review Methodology |
The manuscript clearly describes the literature search strategy, databases used, search keywords, literature selection criteria, publication year range, and the relevance of the selected references. |
10 points |
| 4 |
Quality of References |
The references are credible, relevant, up to date, and derived from reliable scientific sources, such as peer-reviewed journal articles, clinical guidelines, official reports, academic books, or other reputable scientific publications. |
10 points |
| 5 |
Literature Analysis & Synthesis |
The participant demonstrates the ability to critically analyze, compare, and synthesize scientific findings from relevant literature rather than merely summarizing individual articles. |
15 points |
| 6 |
Scientific Benefits & Contributions |
The manuscript provides meaningful contributions to the advancement of pharmaceutical sciences, clinical practice, patient safety, public health education, overdose prevention, or health policy. |
5 points |
| 7 |
Creativity & Originality of Ideas |
The manuscript presents novel perspectives, practical ideas, or innovative approaches to understanding, preventing, or addressing issues related to overdose. |
5 points |
| 8 |
Organization, Language & Compliance |
The manuscript is well organized, systematic, easy to understand, written in appropriate scientific English, and fully complies with the writing guidelines established by the committee. |
5 points |
| Total Manuscript Score |
70 points |
